My Car Amp Stop Working Why?

APOCALYPSE: THE THREAT

Since the world left still dazzled with the Bolivarian revolution despite its undemocratic will remain in power , it would take a look at this Italian production of Chavez perpetrated by fans who came to revel in paradise but found limbo:

It began as a journey to identify and disseminate the achievements of the government of President Hugo Chávez of Venezuela. But after two months of filming, two Italian filmmakers became disenchanted with "Beautiful Revolution."
His documentary, "The Minaccia" (Threat) is the chronicle of a disappointment, told with cinematic verve and pace, and used as "Spotting issues" and chief contrast, the wealth of major oil producers in the world, and poverty faced by the vast majority of its inhabitants.
Silvia Luzi, who works in the newspaper Il Messaggero and Corriere della Sera and Luca Bellino, documentarian and film professor at the University Roma Tre, traveled to Venezuela to collect on his video camera what they saw as achievements of the political process commanded by Chavez . Were fully identified with the Bolivarian cause that it was "a revolution as expected and contradictory."
But the reality they found was very different from that expected. Via

Noticias24

Tags: Venezuela Hugo Chávez reelection amendment referendum

short

Scholarsip For Lazy Eye

Obama "change?

I was only trying religion of Barack Obama's inaugural address in relation to those of Bush . Everywhere it is said that there is much less differences with Bush's speech on assuming his second term . And the much-lauded change? Of course there is but a level of attitude, mood, speech that itself:

The Daily Show With Jon Stewart M - Th 11p / 10c

Changefest '09 - Obama's Inaugural Speech

Barack Obama Interview
John McCain Interview

Sarah Palin Video
Funny Election Video

On The Line blog sarcastically includes some of the big "differences" between speech and Busheano Obamitas. I quote a part that I missed in my previous post on Obama's religion (which was what really struck to those attending the ceremony):

First we have the difference between Bush's religiosity, which verges on Christian fundamentalism, and Obama, who has a greater sensitivity to the different beliefs:

That edifice of character is built in Families, Supported by Communities with standards, and Sustained In Our national life by the Truths of Sinai, the Sermon on the Mount, the words of the Koran, and the VARIED faiths of Our people. George W.
Bush

For we know That patchwork Our heritage is a strength, not a Weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus - and non-believers. Barack H.
Obama

Another thing that was cause for applause crested end point was the assumption that Obama would put the "revolution (neo) conservative" Ronald Reagan initiated . Neither Obama is so innovative about Reagan was not so neo-con as many imagine:

Obama:

What the Cynics fail to Understand Is That the ground has shifted beneath Them - That the arguments That stale Political have consumed us for so long no longer apply. The question we ask today is not whether our government is too big or too small, but whether it works — whether it helps families find jobs at a decent wage, care they can afford, a retirement that is dignified. Where the answer is yes, we intend to move forward. Where the answer is no, programs will end. Those of us who manage the public's dollars will be held to account — to spend wisely, reform bad habits, and do our business in the light of day — because only then can we restore the vital trust between a people and their government.
Nor is the question before us whether the market is a force for good or ill. Its power to generate wealth and expand freedom is unmatched, but this crisis has reminded us that without a watchful eye, the market can spin out of control — and that a nation cannot prosper long when it favors only the prosperous. The success of our economy has always depended not just on the size of our gross domestic product, but on the reach of our prosperity; on our ability to extend opportunity to every willing heart — not out of charity, but because it is the surest route to our common good.

Reagan (en el discurso inaugural de su primer mandato ):

In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem. From time to time we've been tempted to believe that society has become too complex to be managed by self-rule, that Government by an elite group is superior to Government for, by, and of the people. Well, if no one is capable of Among Us Governing Himself, Then Who Among Us has the Capacity to Govern someone else? All of us together, in and out of Government, Must bear the burden. The solutions we seek Must Be equitable, with no one group singled out to pay a high price.

These two approaches (one positive and one negative, if you will) the same objective equal. What are "revolutions" we are talking about then? In no particularly safe from the original American Revolution .

And speaking of Reagan: did you know that your inaugural speech was much more viewers than Obama ?

Tags: Barack Obama George Bush Reagan inaugural speech change United States

Funny Fake Diseases For Halloween

IN GOD WE TRUST OBAMA


Is this a new and secular era? For those who have experienced liver becoming George W. Bush certainly yes. But I think you must think 2 times before firing in raging cacophony with 43 fourth president to use if ever bothered them was his supposed religious fanaticism. If acaso era así, con Barack Obama muy difícilmente habrán de sentirse contentos.

Del discurso inaugural del Obamesías (extractos vía Etimologías ):

We remain a young nation, but in the words of Scripture , the time has come to set aside childish things . The time has come to reaffirm our enduring spirit; to choose our better history; to carry forward that precious gift, that noble idea, passed on from generation to generation: the God-given promise that all are equal, all are free, and all deserve a chance to pursue their full measure of happiness.
(...)
What is required of us now is a new era of responsibility - to Recognition, on the part of Every American, That We Have Duties to ourselves, Our nation, and the world, Duties That We Do Not grudgingly accept gladly seize But Rather, firm in the Knowledge That There is nothing so satisfying to the spirit, so defining of Our Character, Our Than Giving all to a Difficult task. This is the price and the promise of citizenship. This is the source of Our confidence - The Knowledge That God calls on us to shape an Uncertain destiny.

Two clear invocations to God as well as the (Holy) Scriptures, plus "God bless" ( God's grace upon us ) at the end.

I imagine they will say that Bush went further and spoke to a prophet of the Most High. But it turns out, at least in their inaugural speeches and 2001 2005 , not mention God more than 3 times per event, including an appointment (to Lincoln) and 3 end God bless.

And if we are to review their famous speeches such as the "war on terror" or famous speech about the "axis of evil" ( State of the Union, 2002), Bush with just called on God ... in the farewell.

Where do you Mr. Danger was a fundamentalist religious fanatic? Surely mentions God or quoted verbatim the Bible in other languages \u200b\u200b(I do not know), but at least he did not walk the momentous bibliazos giving his audience as many imagine maliciously.

Now back to Obama, not about the brand 44th president may be more theocon Bush. But if religion is what will become of him if you apply the same yardstick as his predecessor?

Tags: George Bush Barack Obama United States speeches